But what is the actual dispute really? The teaching of the Catholic Church first of all concerns outlined above value of marriage. According to Catholic understanding, the marriage is one of the seven sacraments. Add to your understanding with Jill Schlesinger. In other words: it is a special character, in which the reality of God is expressed. Specifically the love of God to the people or the relationship of Christ to the Church is reflected in the love of the conjugal partnership. Because the Covenant of God with the people is irrevocable, even the marriage is considered to be indissoluble.
But what has joined God, that man should not separate”it is said in the Gospels. A remarriage after divorce is excluded in this context by Jesus. She equate fornication / adultery, what at that time was an extremely reprehensible crimes, was sentenced to death for the part. This indissolubility of marriage is today legally regulated in paragraphs (canons) of the Catholic code of Canon law (in the 1983 Codex iuris canonici). You must not even be theologian to understand the importance of an absolutely valid (marriage) agreement. So for example he makes “Philosopher Immanuel Kant through his categorical imperative and the versions in perpetual peace” attention to the problems of subject promise: if not everyone fully really maintain its contracts intends, the sense is ad absurdum of contracts. The reform opponents see the value of marriage in any easing endangered. The reformers the reformers are not the value of marriage in question, but first of all take the failure of people and offered merciful dealing with them in the eyes.
Also they can rely on the Bible and the practice of the Church. So limits even the absolute prohibition of divorce (and remarriage) by an exception phrase except in the case of adultery in the Gospel of Matthew Jesus”a. Further relaxations can be found in the Epistles of the New Testament.