In the absence of uniform rules, regulatory issues of authorship, it is advisable to carefully read the requirements of a particular journal in which you plan to publish the proceedings of the study. 4. Conflicts of interest Conflicts of Terms interest may be obvious or implicit, but in any case they are able to influence the opinions of the authors, reviewers and editors. The presence of implicit conflicts of interest, revealed after the publication of the study report, may evoke in the reader the feeling that it deceived or misled.
Conflicts of interest may be personal, commercial, political, academic or financial. The latter include issues related to payment of staff, funding research projects, shares or shares of the company, fees for lectures, travel and consulting, with additional payments that are made pharmaceutical firms and other companies. Practical steps 1. If a conflict of interest relevant to the topic of study, the researchers, the report’s authors and reviewers should report it in advance of the editors. 2. Editors should explain to the reader what the identified conflicts of interest. Even with doubts about the relevance of conflict of interest on it should inform.
In some cases, editors are obliged to exclude himself from the process review and selection of materials for publication. 5. Reviewing General To improve the quality of research and publication editors must involve evaluation of the materials produced independent experts who send your review in writing. Rules for dealing with reviews in various magazines are different, some of them published a full or abridged text of a review with the name of the reviewer.